TRANSLATION AND TRANSCRIPTION
OF
DR. ASSAD HOMAYOUN'S
INTERVIEW WITH
MR. SAEED GHAEM-MAGHAMI
(RADIO KRSI - LOS
ANGELES)
AUGUST
04, 2005
Q: Dr.
Assad Homayoun, a professor in
an American university, expert
in our country=s politics, and
former diplomat, has accepted
our invitation for a discussion
and is on air right now. Mr.
Assad Homayoun, good morning.
AH: Good
morning Mr. Ghaem-Maghami and
hello to our fellow countrymen,
who listen to your program.
Q: Mr.
Homayoun, the latest news at the
end of this month tell us
everyone is awaiting September
3, the next meeting of the
International Atomic Energy
Agency. From another point of
view, it is said that in such
situations, the position of the
United States of America in its
relations with the Islamic
Republic is still uncertain.
They believe that still in its
relations with the Islamic
Republic and coming face to face
with this regime, the United
States of America is hesitant
and wavering. Are these
assessments correct?
AH: I do no
think that America’s policy
towards Iran has changed.
America=s policy towards Islamic
Republic is clear. There are
still some discussions on the
form in which this policy will
be implemented and when, because
it is related to Iraq. For now,
America is wrapped up in Iraq
and must see the Iraqi
constitution to completion and
then the Iraqi elections must
take place in January 1, 2006,
in order for it to release some
of its forces in Iraq. But
while the Islamic Republic is
continuing with its terrorism
activities, [America] will
continue with its nuclear
proliferation issues. [Islamic
Republic] is aggressively
pursuing nuclear capabilities.
As far as I know and through my
discussions with [the
Americans], nobody in the
American government doubts this
B that is, the Islamic Republic
wants to become atomic; Islamic
Republic wants America to leave
the region; and Islamic Republic
will continue with terrorist;
and it will not change. The
devil is the devil B in no way,
can its thoughts or actions be
changed. And the Iraq situation
must be connected to this
matter. Several days ago, Dr.
Kissinger, a farsighted American
statesman, wrote an article in
the Washington Post, and
this article was very thorough
and the gist of the article was
that if America does not succeed
in Iraq, fundamentalism will
spread across other Arab
nations, and Islamism will also
play an important role in
European countries, and the
balance of power around the
world will be disrupted. After
that, Mr. Rumsfeld spoke about
Iran=s meddling in Iraq and its
military assistance to the
terrorists in Iraq. After that
Mr. Bush himself spoke on August
11 about this matter. Mr.
Cheney spoke. All three of them
and, in general, the American
administration believes that the
Islamic Republic with respect to
meddling in Afghanistan,
meddling in Iraq, and terrorism
issues will not change its
thoughts B an example is the new
President, who said Aterrorism
and martyrdom is the highest
form of art that exists and
Islam must spread across the
world.@
Therefore, America will not
change its mind. But it is
different B we have to wait and
see when it will act. In the
interim, Europeans are
continuing with diplomacy, they
are taking a firmer stand and
say that until Islamic Republic
honors the agreements that it
reached with the three main
European countries and does not
stop its uranium enrichment
activities in Isfahan and other
places, they will not continue
with negotiations. We must see
what happens. But what is
certain is that currently the
Islamic Republic is continuing
with its atomic activities.
With respect to atomic
activities, in America, there
are different views that in my
discussions and contacts with
those, who are involved and
knowledgeable in these matters,
the majority believe that Iran
has a proud history, with
attention to ancient records,
Iran was liberal, and everyone
knows about Cyrus the Great=s
Bill of Rights B they even make
reference to it in their
discussions. They say Iran has
a young population, Iran has a
great potential for movement and
progress because it has all the
necessary resources, but in Iran
there are two different
school-of-thoughts. One way of
Iranian thinking is for a
secular and free regime and
democratic, and Americans say if
such a government forms, they
think there may not be an issue
for it to have atomic
capabilities. But nuclear power
in the hands of the mullahs, who
are fanatic and bear no
responsibility for the problems
in Iran, they are spreading
terrorism across the world, and
they are at war with Iranian
nationalism, and they want to
push America out of the region.
Therefore, under no
circumstances, should nuclear
capabilities B and everyone is
aware that the Islamic Republic
is pursuing it, even if it
claims otherwise B fall in the
hands of such a regime
especially people of Iran are
aware of this matter B only a
small group of the Revolutionary
Guards is actually involved with
carrying out the criminal orders
of this regime B the rest of the
Guards read the news, follow the
current affairs, they love Iran,
the army as well B they must
think that America in no way
will allow the Islamic Republic
to obtain nuclear capabilities,
and even if it does, if it makes
such a mistake, it will cause
the disintegration of Iran.
America has and is such a
power. They must understand
that it will either be a
national secular, free Iran or a
disintegrated Iran because of
some corrupted mullahs. I do
not see any changes in the way
America thinks, but politics B
when they may act, when they may
implement their policy B I do
not know. The most important
thing, Mr. Ghaem-Maghami, is the
people of Iran. Islamic
Republic may not be afraid of
America, but its enemy is the
people of Iran. Nothing else
may be more frightening to this
regime than the Iranian women
and men B the people have risen
and they do not accept this
regime B and [the people of
Iran] have a problem which we
have talked about in the past B
we were supposed to discuss it
again B that is, the people of
Iran must unite and think about
an organized movement. They
must bring a leadership to the
picture and America will speak
with the opposition of the
Islamic Republic B and maybe
it=s necessary [for Iranians] to
form a government in exile B and
with the will of the Iranian
people and the international
support, the Islamic Republic
will not have a place in Iran.
Q: Dr.
Assad Homayoun, we want to
discuss the matters in
connection with a new Iranian
leadership as soon as possible.
We want your thoughts on this
matter. At this time, please
allow us to focus on the Islamic
Republic=s activities with
respect to nuclear energy.
Today, in front of the Embassies
of France and England, there
were demonstrations -- are there
really disagreements between the
EU and Islamic Republic, or are
these disagreements weak?
AH: There is
a deal between the EU and the
Islamic Republic. There are
economic benefits at stake. The
European countries want to
continue their relations with
Iran and at the same time, they
are afraid that the Islamic
Republic has nuclear power and
this will be provided to the
terrorist cells such as
Hezbollah, Hamas, etc. The
Europeans are worried and all of
Europeans and all of the West
and America have interest in the
Middle East. These interests
include oil, security of the
Middle East, balance of power in
the Middle East. If America
fails there, if Islamic Republic
successfully obtains nuclear
power, the consequences will be
much worst for Europe than
America. Therefore, differences
of opinion exist but not very
deep. What is obvious is that
some of the liberals here and in
Europe and other places oppose
the American administration.
They will make certain attempts
B for example, an article in the
Washington Post today B
I=m sure you=ve seen it....
Q: Yes, it
states that the Islamic Republic
is not guilty and the atomic
traces on the centrifuges B one
of the issues brought on by the
Americans B came from Pakistan
and in reality, America does not
have any evidence against the
Islamic Republic.
AH: First,
we need to see who wrote this
article. Where was it printed,
on what page, and what were its
resources. It appears in large
print on the front page of the
Washington Post by Ms.
Dafna Linzer, it=s either a she
or a he, I=m not sure. But the
author is unknown. The
Washington Post is a liberal
paper and opposes Bush. It
strongly opposes Mr. John
Bolton, and the U.N., in my
opinion, has helped this
article. This was written
carefully and in one paragraph,
I noted its political attack on
Mr. John Bolton B this brings
about a question B why would
Pakistan give Iran the
contaminated centrifuges? First
of all, it states some
scientists collaborated and
reviewed the evidence and
noticed that Iran is not
enriching uranium, and this came
from Pakistan with the materials
that they delivered to Iran.
This is not correct. It is not
from the government B it is not
clear who helped these
scientists and the issue is not
just that; it=s plutonium. The
issue is what the Islamic
Republic got from the Central
Asians, and then Europe and
Russia and later North Korea. I
mean nuclear warheads. It was
around last November, if I=m not
mistaken, when Mr. Colin Powell,
the former U.S. Secretary of
State, said that Iran is
involved in new activities in
connection with new missiles,
and this is very alarming and
dangerous. But then he didn’t
bring it up again, because if
they had continued with the
topic, the American Congress
would have wanted Bush to act
immediately and since it is
wrapped up in Iraq, he may not
have seen it feasible. And the
most important issue is
terrorism, civil rights, and
freedom for the Iranian people.
Iranians have risen against the
regime and know that this regime
will not change its ways and
wants to rule Iran. It has
destroyed Iran=s national pride,
it does not accept Iran=s might,
and if it can, it wants to ban
ancient Iranian celebrations
such as Noruz, Mehregan and in
their place put Islamic holidays
such as Eideh Ghorban, Ghadir,
and Fetr on the calendars. It
wants to destroy all Iranian
national sites and antiquities.
It wants to put Imam-zadehs in
their places. But the regime is
unaware that the people of Iran
have risen and get united and
will liberate Iran. Iranians
today play an important role in
history and must and will once
and for all put an end to the
mullahcracy. The Clerics are are
unaware of Persian nationalism
and logic of Persian history.
As the famous Persian poet Hafez
of Shiraz said, “Iran is a land
in which the faith of the
universe has gone with the
wind.” I am confident that
Iranians will do away with this
regime. America, as the
President has repeatedly said,
will stand with us, but it=s up
to us to create leadership, and
then you will witness how 70
million people will depose these
mullahs swiftly.
Q: Mr.
Homayoun, today a Canadian
newspaper in a thorough article
wrote about the revolt of the
people of Kurdistan. It writes
that U.S. press is not properly
covering and reporting regime’s
crime again in Iranian
Kurdistan. Why have the
journalists in America ignored
it or not reported it as much as
they should have?
AH: One
reason is perhaps we don=t have
a proper voice and organization
to report them and bring their
efforts to the attention of the
international community.
Second, America is wrapped up in
Iraq and other places, but just
one newspaper has correctly
reported that Kurdistan is ____. The Kurds love Iran and
played an important role in the
creation of ancient Iran, but
the clerical regime adopted a
policy of harsh repression
against those brave people who
stood up against the despotic
clerics for freedom. The same
is true for Khuzestan and every
where else. We must be able to
show and reflect the crimes that
this regime is committing in
Kurdistan and indeed against all
Iranians. Unfortunately, this
needs an organization, it needs
financial backing. The Islamic
Republic is using and robbing
the Iranian oil funds B tens of
millions of dollars are being
spent abroad on its public
relations and terrorism
activities, but Iranians lack
financial recourses,
organization, and Leadership.
Iranians who would like to
liberate Iran must think about
this B they must realize that
this regime will put Iran in a
dangerous position B facing
America B it is very dreadful.
We do not like this; it may
happen and if it does, Iran may
be divided and disintegrated.
Therefore, Iranians --
especially the 5 million who are
living in the U.S., Europe and
elsewhere and who are educated
and very wealthy -- must move.
This must be done. The
Palestinians did it and well,
they are reaching something B
they are very active abroad.
Five million Iranians abroad are
very powerful and this is
pitiful that most of the are
indifferent
Q: Dr. Assad
Homayoun, my last question during
our last four minutes B please give
us your opinion about the situation
of America and Iraq?
AH: American has
about 150,000 soldiers in Iraq. In
U.S., there are those who want
America to retreat. I don=t believe
it will do so even within the next
four to five years. The issue is
not Iraq, the issue is Middle East,
and the balance of power there, and
China=s interest in entering that
region. America will try to push
this Constitution and bring it to
vote, and even at this point, the
draft Constitution has made the
American administration happy, and
the State Department is cautiously
happy, Mr. Zal Khalilzad is busy
there. They still have three days B
one day passed B they have two more
days. If America is successful
there, it is very very important.
Of course, there are some problems;
for example, women=s rights, Islam=s
role and federalism, but America
must succeed. Just as Mr. Kissinger
said, if America fails in Iraq, the
global balance of power will be
disrupted. And he meant that Europe
also needs to be aware and
understand. One of the entities
that feeds the problems in Iraq is
the Islamic Republic. Therefore, it
is not just atomic power, it is
terrorism, meddling in Iraq,
meddling in Afghanistan, and the
disruption in the region.
Q: A Kuwaiti
newspaper has accused the
Revolutionary Guard of its
involvements with the use of
missiles in Jordan. Is this
accusation correct?
AH: I don=t
know. But I do not accuse all of
the guards. I do not accuse all the
employees of the Ministry of
Intelligence. There is a group of
the Revolutionary Guards who work
with corrupt mullahs such as
Ayatollah Misbah Yazdi, and the new
President is his protege and other
hard-line clerics want to disrupt
and destabilize the region. The
Revolutionary Guards have a huge
budget and meddle every where in the
Middle East. America knows this,
but sometimes condones it. Also
America moves slow, and It must find
the right time. This reminds me of
a Japanese commander Yamamuto during
WWII, who said of America to his
Japanese fellows, “I know this giant
wakes up late, but it must not be
awaken, because once awaken, we will
have a big problem.@ And we know
what happened then. Yes, the
guards, in my opinion, meddle in all
areas, in Afghanistan and Iraq. Not
all the guards B just the small
group that does the dirty work for a
bunch of corrupt mullahs.
Q: Mr. Assad
Homayoun, I am grateful for your
participation in these discussions.
I hope very soon we will talk about
the leadership issue.
AH: Thank you
for your kindness. God be with
you